whichdb
vs

Apache HugeGraph vs Galaxybase

Apache HugeGraph: Apache graph database from Baidu with Gremlin and Cypher, pluggable backends and a distributed store. Galaxybase: Chinese native distributed graph database for HTAP graph workloads in banking and energy.

key differences

  • Licensing: Apache HugeGraph is open source (permissive) (Apache License 2.0); Galaxybase is proprietary (Proprietary (free edition available)).
  • Transactions: Apache HugeGraph offers limited ACID; Galaxybase offers full.
  • Only Apache HugeGraph has full-text search, ttl / expiry, compression.
  • Only Galaxybase has transactions.

choose apache-hugegraph for

  • +Large knowledge graphs
  • +Risk control and anti-fraud
  • +Social relationship analysis
  • +GraphRAG pipelines

best at · Traversal, Graph analytics, Knowledge graph

choose galaxybase for

  • +Bank risk control and anti-fraud
  • +Power-grid topology analysis
  • +Enterprise knowledge graphs
  • +Graph-enhanced RAG

best at · Traversal, Graph analytics, HTAP

Apache HugeGraphApache graph database from Baidu with Gremlin and Cypher, pluggable backends and a distributed store.
GalaxybaseChinese native distributed graph database for HTAP graph workloads in banking and energy.
overview
Primary model
Graph
Graph
Also supports
–
–
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
Apache Software Foundation
CreateLink (Zhejiang Chuanglin Technology)
First release
2018
2019
Latest version
1.7.0 (Nov 16, 2025)
–
License
Open source (permissive)Apache License 2.0
ProprietaryProprietary (free edition available)
Free tier
✓
✓
popularity
WhichDB Score
9.3
0.0
Rank
#314
#737
GitHub stars
3.2K
–
Stack Overflow questions
–
–
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Large (≤ 1 PB)
Large (≤ 1 PB)
Horizontal scaling
Native
Native
Multi-region
None
None
ACID
Limited
Full
Consistency
Strong
Strong
Schema
Strict
Strict
Architecture
Single node, Distributed, Client server
Distributed, Client server
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
—
—
Serverless
—
—
Embedded
—
—
Edge
—
—
Clouds
–
–
capabilities
Transactions
—
✓
Joins
—
—
Secondary indexes
✓
✓
Full-text search
✓
—
Vector search
—
—
Geospatial
—
—
JSON
—
—
Change data capture
—
—
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
—
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
✓
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
—
—
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
✓
—
Encryption at rest
—
—
Role-based access
✓
✓
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
—
—
Streaming ingest
—
—
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
—
interfaces
Query languages
Gremlin, openCypher
Cypher
Client languages
Java, Python, Go
–
Best for
Traversal, Graph analytics, Knowledge graph, RAG
Traversal, Graph analytics, HTAP, Knowledge graph
Add more to this comparisonNot sure either fits? Try smart match

Apache HugeGraph vs Galaxybase: FAQ

What is the difference between Apache HugeGraph and Galaxybase?

Apache HugeGraph: Apache graph database from Baidu with Gremlin and Cypher, pluggable backends and a distributed store. Galaxybase: Chinese native distributed graph database for HTAP graph workloads in banking and energy. Licensing: Apache HugeGraph is open source (permissive) (Apache License 2.0); Galaxybase is proprietary (Proprietary (free edition available)). Transactions: Apache HugeGraph offers limited ACID; Galaxybase offers full. Only Apache HugeGraph has full-text search, ttl / expiry, compression.

When should I choose Apache HugeGraph over Galaxybase?

Choose Apache HugeGraph for large knowledge graphs; risk control and anti-fraud; and social relationship analysis. Choose Galaxybase for bank risk control and anti-fraud; power-grid topology analysis; and enterprise knowledge graphs.

Is Apache HugeGraph or Galaxybase more popular?

Apache HugeGraph ranks #314 on the WhichDB Score (9.3/100) and Galaxybase ranks #737 (0.0/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are Apache HugeGraph and Galaxybase open source?

Yes. Apache HugeGraph is open source. License: Apache License 2.0. No. Galaxybase is proprietary, closed-source software.