vs

IndraDB vs Neo4j

IndraDB: Rust graph database, inspired by Facebook's TAO, usable as an embedded library or a gRPC server. Neo4j: The default property-graph database, with Cypher, a big ecosystem and a managed cloud.

key differences

  • Neo4j is built for larger datasets (≤ 10 TB) than IndraDB (≤ 100 GB).
  • Horizontal scaling is none in IndraDB and addon in Neo4j.
  • Transactions: IndraDB offers limited ACID; Neo4j offers full.
  • Only IndraDB has json, in-memory.
  • Only Neo4j has transactions, full-text search, vector search, geospatial, change data capture.
  • IndraDB can run embedded in your application process.

choose indradb for

  • +Embedding a property graph in a Rust service
  • +Social or link graphs queried by bounded hops
  • +Prototyping graph features before adopting a larger engine

best at · Traversal, Embedded

choose neo4j for

  • +Fraud rings and entity resolution
  • +Real-time recommendations
  • +Knowledge graphs for GraphRAG
  • +Network and IT dependency mapping

best at · Traversal, Graph analytics, Knowledge graph

overview
Primary model
Graph
Graph
Also supports
–
Vector
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
IndraDB project (Yusuf Simonson)
Neo4j, Inc.
First release
2018
2007
Latest version
5.0.0 (Aug 16, 2025)
2026.10.1 (Oct 2026)
License
Open source (copyleft)Mozilla Public License 2.0
Open source (copyleft)GPL-3.0 (Community) / commercial (Enterprise)
Free tier
✓
✓
popularity
WhichDB Score
4.5
61.2
Rank
#402
#15
GitHub stars
2.5K
17.4K
Stack Overflow questions
–
23K
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Small (≤ 100 GB)
Medium (≤ 10 TB)
Horizontal scaling
None
Addon
Multi-region
None
Read replicas
ACID
Limited
Full
Consistency
Strong
Strong, Causal
Schema
Schemaless
Flexible
Architecture
Client server, Embedded, Single node
Single node, Primary replica, Client server
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
—
✓
Serverless
—
—
Embedded
✓
—
Edge
—
—
Clouds
–
AWS, Google Cloud, Azure
capabilities
Transactions
—
✓
Joins
—
—
Secondary indexes
✓
✓
Full-text search
—
✓
Vector search
—
✓
Geospatial
—
✓
JSON
✓
—
Change data capture
—
✓
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
✓
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
✓
—
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
—
—
Encryption at rest
—
✓
Role-based access
—
✓
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
—
✓
Streaming ingest
—
✓
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
—
interfaces
Query languages
IndraDB query API
Cypher, GQL
Client languages
Rust, Python
Java, JavaScript, Python, Go, .NET, Rust (community)
Best for
Traversal, Embedded
Traversal, Graph analytics, Knowledge graph, RAG

IndraDB vs Neo4j: FAQ

What is the difference between IndraDB and Neo4j?

IndraDB: Rust graph database, inspired by Facebook's TAO, usable as an embedded library or a gRPC server. Neo4j: The default property-graph database, with Cypher, a big ecosystem and a managed cloud. Neo4j is built for larger datasets (≤ 10 TB) than IndraDB (≤ 100 GB). Horizontal scaling is none in IndraDB and addon in Neo4j. Transactions: IndraDB offers limited ACID; Neo4j offers full.

When should I choose IndraDB over Neo4j?

Choose IndraDB for embedding a property graph in a Rust service, social or link graphs queried by bounded hops and prototyping graph features before adopting a larger engine. Choose Neo4j for fraud rings and entity resolution; real-time recommendations; and knowledge graphs for GraphRAG.

Is IndraDB or Neo4j more popular?

Neo4j ranks #15 on the WhichDB Score (61.2/100) and IndraDB ranks #402 (4.5/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are IndraDB and Neo4j open source?

Yes. IndraDB is open source. License: Mozilla Public License 2.0. Yes. Neo4j is open source. License: GPL-3.0 (Community) / commercial (Enterprise).