vs

Elasticsearch vs Grafana Tempo

Elasticsearch: Lucene-based distributed search and analytics engine for text, vectors, logs and metrics. Grafana Tempo: Object-storage-backed distributed tracing backend with TraceQL search and trace-derived metrics.

key differences

  • Elasticsearch is primarily a search engine database; Grafana Tempo is columnar / OLAP.
  • Transactions: Elasticsearch offers limited ACID; Grafana Tempo offers none.
  • Only Elasticsearch has joins, secondary indexes, full-text search, vector search, geospatial.
  • Only Grafana Tempo has ttl / expiry, columnar storage.
  • Elasticsearch has a serverless option; Grafana Tempo does not.

choose elasticsearch for

  • +E-commerce and site search with faceting
  • +Log, metrics and SIEM analytics
  • +Hybrid keyword plus semantic retrieval for RAG
  • +Geospatial search and aggregations

best at · Search, Vector search, RAG

choose grafana-tempo for

  • +Distributed tracing for microservices
  • +Storing full-fidelity OpenTelemetry traces
  • +Deriving service-level metrics from spans

best at · Observability

overview
Primary model
Search Engine
Columnar / OLAP
Also supports
Document, Vector, Spatial, Time-Series
Time-Series
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
Elastic N.V.
Grafana Labs
First release
2010
2020
Latest version
9.5.5 (Oct 6, 2026)
3.1.1 (Oct 21, 2026)
License
Open source (copyleft)AGPL-3.0, SSPL 1.0 or Elastic License 2.0 (your choice)
Open source (copyleft)GNU AGPL v3.0
Free tier
✓
✓
popularity
WhichDB Score
75.1
14.1
Rank
#6
#239
GitHub stars
78.4K
5.5K
Stack Overflow questions
58.2K
25
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Massive (Multi-PB)
Massive (Multi-PB)
Horizontal scaling
Native
Native
Multi-region
Read replicas
None
ACID
Limited
None
Consistency
Eventual
Eventual
Schema
Flexible
Schemaless
Architecture
Distributed, Client server
Single node, Distributed, Shared storage
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
✓
✓
Serverless
✓
—
Embedded
—
—
Edge
—
—
Clouds
AWS, Google Cloud, Azure
AWS, Google Cloud, Azure
capabilities
Transactions
—
—
Joins
✓
—
Secondary indexes
✓
—
Full-text search
✓
—
Vector search
✓
—
Geospatial
✓
—
JSON
✓
—
Change data capture
—
—
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
—
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
✓
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
✓
In-memory
—
—
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
✓
✓
Encryption at rest
—
—
Role-based access
✓
—
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
✓
—
Streaming ingest
✓
✓
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
—
interfaces
Query languages
Query DSL, ES|QL, SQL, EQL
TraceQL
Client languages
Java, Python, JavaScript, Go, .NET, Ruby, PHP, Rust
–
Best for
Search, Vector search, RAG, Observability
Observability

Elasticsearch vs Grafana Tempo: FAQ

What is the difference between Elasticsearch and Grafana Tempo?

Elasticsearch: Lucene-based distributed search and analytics engine for text, vectors, logs and metrics. Grafana Tempo: Object-storage-backed distributed tracing backend with TraceQL search and trace-derived metrics. Elasticsearch is primarily a search engine database; Grafana Tempo is columnar / OLAP. Transactions: Elasticsearch offers limited ACID; Grafana Tempo offers none. Only Elasticsearch has joins, secondary indexes, full-text search, vector search, geospatial.

When should I choose Elasticsearch over Grafana Tempo?

Choose Elasticsearch for E-commerce and site search with faceting; log, metrics and SIEM analytics; and hybrid keyword plus semantic retrieval for RAG. Choose Grafana Tempo for distributed tracing for microservices, storing full-fidelity OpenTelemetry traces and deriving service-level metrics from spans.

Is Elasticsearch or Grafana Tempo more popular?

Elasticsearch ranks #6 on the WhichDB Score (75.1/100) and Grafana Tempo ranks #239 (14.1/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are Elasticsearch and Grafana Tempo open source?

Yes. Elasticsearch is open source. License: AGPL-3.0, SSPL 1.0 or Elastic License 2.0 (your choice). Yes. Grafana Tempo is open source. License: GNU AGPL v3.0.