whichdb
vs

Eclipse RDF4J vs Oxigraph

Eclipse RDF4J: Eclipse Foundation's Java RDF framework with native, LMDB and in-memory SPARQL stores. Oxigraph: Small, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server.

key differences

  • Only Eclipse RDF4J has full-text search, geospatial.
  • Only Oxigraph has compression, runs in webassembly.

choose eclipse-rdf4j for

  • +Embedding RDF storage in Java applications
  • +SHACL validation pipelines
  • +A common RDF API across multiple triplestores
  • +Federated SPARQL queries

best at · Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata

choose oxigraph for

  • +Embedding RDF in Python or Rust apps
  • +Client-side SPARQL in the browser
  • +Small SPARQL endpoints for datasets and vocabularies
  • +Testing RDF pipelines

best at · Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata

Eclipse RDF4JEclipse Foundation's Java RDF framework with native, LMDB and in-memory SPARQL stores.
OxigraphSmall, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server.
overview
Primary model
RDF / Triple Store
RDF / Triple Store
Also supports
–
–
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
Eclipse Foundation
Oxigraph community (Tpt)
First release
2016
2018
Latest version
6.0.0 (Aug 10, 2026)
0.5.13 (Oct 22, 2026)
License
Open source (permissive)BSD 3-Clause License
Open source (permissive)Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Free tier
✓
✓
popularity
WhichDB Score
10.6
15.1
Rank
#296
#223
GitHub stars
422
2K
Stack Overflow questions
160
–
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Small (≤ 100 GB)
Small (≤ 100 GB)
Horizontal scaling
None
None
Multi-region
None
None
ACID
Full
Full
Consistency
Strong
Strong
Schema
Schemaless
Schemaless
Architecture
Embedded, Single node, Client server
Embedded, Single node, Client server
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
—
—
Serverless
—
—
Embedded
✓
✓
Edge
—
—
Clouds
–
–
capabilities
Transactions
✓
✓
Joins
—
—
Secondary indexes
—
—
Full-text search
✓
—
Vector search
—
—
Geospatial
✓
—
JSON
—
—
Change data capture
—
—
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
—
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
✓
✓
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
—
✓
Encryption at rest
—
—
Role-based access
—
—
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
—
—
Streaming ingest
—
—
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
✓
interfaces
Query languages
SPARQL
SPARQL
Client languages
Java
Rust, Python, JavaScript
Best for
Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata
Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata, Scientific
Add more to this comparisonNot sure either fits? Try smart match

Eclipse RDF4J vs Oxigraph: FAQ

What is the difference between Eclipse RDF4J and Oxigraph?

Eclipse RDF4J: Eclipse Foundation's Java RDF framework with native, LMDB and in-memory SPARQL stores. Oxigraph: Small, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server. Only Eclipse RDF4J has full-text search, geospatial. Only Oxigraph has compression, runs in webassembly.

When should I choose Eclipse RDF4J over Oxigraph?

Choose Eclipse RDF4J for embedding RDF storage in Java applications, SHACL validation pipelines and A common RDF API across multiple triplestores. Choose Oxigraph for embedding RDF in Python or Rust apps; client-side SPARQL in the browser; and small SPARQL endpoints for datasets and vocabularies.

Is Eclipse RDF4J or Oxigraph more popular?

Oxigraph ranks #223 on the WhichDB Score (15.1/100) and Eclipse RDF4J ranks #296 (10.6/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are Eclipse RDF4J and Oxigraph open source?

Yes. Eclipse RDF4J is open source. License: BSD 3-Clause License. Yes. Oxigraph is open source. License: Apache-2.0 OR MIT.