whichdb
vs

DBMaker vs Progress OpenEdge

DBMaker: SYSCOM's ODBC-native SQL database from Taiwan, known for letting COBOL programs use SQL tables. Progress OpenEdge: Integrated RDBMS plus ABL 4GL application platform behind thousands of ERP and vertical business apps.

key differences

  • Only Progress OpenEdge has full-text search, change data capture, encryption at rest, online schema changes.

choose dbmaker for

  • +Migrating legacy COBOL indexed-file applications to a relational store
  • +ISV-bundled databases for Taiwanese enterprise and government software
  • +Departmental OLTP on Windows or Linux servers

best at · OLTP, Content

choose progress-openedge for

  • +Running ERP, distribution and manufacturing packages built on OpenEdge
  • +Modernising ABL apps behind REST APIs with PASOE
  • +ISV vertical applications sold to SMBs

best at · OLTP

DBMakerSYSCOM's ODBC-native SQL database from Taiwan, known for letting COBOL programs use SQL tables.
Progress OpenEdgeIntegrated RDBMS plus ABL 4GL application platform behind thousands of ERP and vertical business apps.
overview
Primary model
Relational
Relational
Also supports
–
–
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
SYSCOM Group (Syscom Computer Engineering Co.)
Progress Software
First release
1994
1984
Latest version
5.4.8 (Jul 28, 2026)
13.0 (Feb 10, 2026)
License
ProprietaryProprietary
ProprietaryProprietary commercial license
Free tier
—
—
popularity
WhichDB Score
0.0
20.4
Rank
#715
#157
GitHub stars
–
–
Stack Overflow questions
–
1.5K
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Medium (≤ 10 TB)
Medium (≤ 10 TB)
Horizontal scaling
None
None
Multi-region
None
Read replicas
ACID
Full
Full
Consistency
Strong
Strong
Schema
Strict
Strict
Architecture
Client server, Single node
Client server, Primary replica
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
—
—
Serverless
—
—
Embedded
—
—
Edge
—
—
Clouds
–
–
capabilities
Transactions
✓
✓
Joins
✓
✓
Secondary indexes
✓
✓
Full-text search
—
✓
Vector search
—
—
Geospatial
—
—
JSON
—
—
Change data capture
—
✓
Triggers
✓
✓
Stored procedures
✓
✓
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
—
—
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
—
—
Encryption at rest
—
✓
Role-based access
✓
✓
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
—
✓
Streaming ingest
—
—
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
—
interfaces
Query languages
SQL
ABL (Advanced Business Language), SQL-92
Client languages
C, Java, COBOL, PHP, Perl
ABL, Java, C#, C
Best for
OLTP, Content
OLTP
Add more to this comparisonNot sure either fits? Try smart match

DBMaker vs Progress OpenEdge: FAQ

What is the difference between DBMaker and Progress OpenEdge?

DBMaker: SYSCOM's ODBC-native SQL database from Taiwan, known for letting COBOL programs use SQL tables. Progress OpenEdge: Integrated RDBMS plus ABL 4GL application platform behind thousands of ERP and vertical business apps. Only Progress OpenEdge has full-text search, change data capture, encryption at rest, online schema changes.

When should I choose DBMaker over Progress OpenEdge?

Choose DBMaker for migrating legacy COBOL indexed-file applications to a relational store; ISV-bundled databases for Taiwanese enterprise and government software; and departmental OLTP on Windows or Linux servers. Choose Progress OpenEdge for running ERP, distribution and manufacturing packages built on OpenEdge; modernising ABL apps behind REST APIs with PASOE; and ISV vertical applications sold to SMBs.

Is DBMaker or Progress OpenEdge more popular?

Progress OpenEdge ranks #157 on the WhichDB Score (20.4/100) and DBMaker ranks #715 (0.0/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are DBMaker and Progress OpenEdge open source?

No. DBMaker is proprietary, closed-source software. No. Progress OpenEdge is proprietary, closed-source software.