CockroachDB vs Google F1
CockroachDB: Postgres-wire distributed SQL built to survive node, zone and region failures with serializable transactions. Google F1: Google's internal distributed SQL database on Spanner that replaced sharded MySQL for AdWords.
key differences
- Licensing: CockroachDB is source-available (CockroachDB Software License); Google F1 is proprietary (Internal Google software (not distributed)).
- Only CockroachDB has full-text search, vector search, geospatial, json, triggers.
- CockroachDB has a serverless option; Google F1 does not.
choose cockroachdb for
- +Global payments and ledger systems of record
- +Identity, account and session metadata across regions
- +Inventory and order management with strict consistency
- +Data-residency workloads that must pin rows to a country
best at · OLTP, Geo, Metadata
choose google-f1 for
- +Reference design for distributed SQL on a strongly consistent store
- +Studying online schema-change protocols
- +Background for choosing Spanner, CockroachDB or YugabyteDB
best at · OLTP, OLAP, HTAP
CockroachDB vs Google F1: FAQ
What is the difference between CockroachDB and Google F1?
CockroachDB: Postgres-wire distributed SQL built to survive node, zone and region failures with serializable transactions. Google F1: Google's internal distributed SQL database on Spanner that replaced sharded MySQL for AdWords. Licensing: CockroachDB is source-available (CockroachDB Software License); Google F1 is proprietary (Internal Google software (not distributed)). Only CockroachDB has full-text search, vector search, geospatial, json, triggers. CockroachDB has a serverless option; Google F1 does not.
When should I choose CockroachDB over Google F1?
Choose CockroachDB for global payments and ledger systems of record; identity, account and session metadata across regions; and inventory and order management with strict consistency. Choose Google F1 for reference design for distributed SQL on a strongly consistent store; studying online schema-change protocols; and background for choosing Spanner, CockroachDB or YugabyteDB.
Is CockroachDB or Google F1 more popular?
CockroachDB ranks #33 on the WhichDB Score (47.1/100) and Google F1 ranks #745 (0.0/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.
Are CockroachDB and Google F1 open source?
Not in the OSI sense. CockroachDB is source-available: you can read the code, but the license restricts some uses, typically offering it as a competing managed service. License: CockroachDB Software License. No. Google F1 is proprietary, closed-source software. License: Internal Google software (not distributed).