whichdb
vs

Apache Jena TDB vs Oxigraph

Apache Jena TDB: Apache Jena's native RDF store, embeddable in Java or served over SPARQL with Fuseki. Oxigraph: Small, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server.

key differences

  • Apache Jena TDB is built for larger datasets (≤ 10 TB) than Oxigraph (≤ 100 GB).
  • Only Apache Jena TDB has full-text search, geospatial.
  • Only Oxigraph has compression, runs in webassembly.

choose apache-jena-tdb for

  • +Embedded RDF storage in Java applications
  • +SPARQL endpoints for research datasets
  • +Ontology and vocabulary management
  • +Testing and prototyping semantic-web apps

best at · Knowledge graph, Metadata, Embedded

choose oxigraph for

  • +Embedding RDF in Python or Rust apps
  • +Client-side SPARQL in the browser
  • +Small SPARQL endpoints for datasets and vocabularies
  • +Testing RDF pipelines

best at · Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata

Apache Jena TDBApache Jena's native RDF store, embeddable in Java or served over SPARQL with Fuseki.
OxigraphSmall, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server.
overview
Primary model
RDF / Triple Store
RDF / Triple Store
Also supports
–
–
Type
Database engine
Database engine
Status
Active
Active
Developer
Apache Software Foundation
Oxigraph community (Tpt)
First release
2008
2018
Latest version
6.2.0 (Jul 2026)
0.5.13 (Oct 22, 2026)
License
Open source (permissive)Apache License 2.0
Open source (permissive)Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Free tier
✓
✓
popularity
WhichDB Score
18.9
15.1
Rank
#175
#223
GitHub stars
1.5K
2K
Stack Overflow questions
2.4K
–
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Medium (≤ 10 TB)
Small (≤ 100 GB)
Horizontal scaling
None
None
Multi-region
None
None
ACID
Full
Full
Consistency
Strong
Strong
Schema
Schemaless
Schemaless
Architecture
Single node, Embedded, Client server
Embedded, Single node, Client server
deployment
Self-hosted
✓
✓
Vendor-managed cloud
—
—
Serverless
—
—
Embedded
✓
✓
Edge
—
—
Clouds
–
–
capabilities
Transactions
✓
✓
Joins
—
—
Secondary indexes
—
—
Full-text search
✓
—
Vector search
—
—
Geospatial
✓
—
JSON
—
—
Change data capture
—
—
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
—
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
✓
✓
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
—
✓
Encryption at rest
—
—
Role-based access
—
—
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
—
—
Streaming ingest
—
—
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
✓
interfaces
Query languages
SPARQL
SPARQL
Client languages
Java
Rust, Python, JavaScript
Best for
Knowledge graph, Metadata, Embedded, Scientific
Knowledge graph, Embedded, Metadata, Scientific
Add more to this comparisonNot sure either fits? Try smart match

Apache Jena TDB vs Oxigraph: FAQ

What is the difference between Apache Jena TDB and Oxigraph?

Apache Jena TDB: Apache Jena's native RDF store, embeddable in Java or served over SPARQL with Fuseki. Oxigraph: Small, fast SPARQL database in Rust that embeds in Rust, Python and JavaScript or runs as a server. Apache Jena TDB is built for larger datasets (≤ 10 TB) than Oxigraph (≤ 100 GB). Only Apache Jena TDB has full-text search, geospatial. Only Oxigraph has compression, runs in webassembly.

When should I choose Apache Jena TDB over Oxigraph?

Choose Apache Jena TDB for embedded RDF storage in Java applications; SPARQL endpoints for research datasets; and ontology and vocabulary management. Choose Oxigraph for embedding RDF in Python or Rust apps; client-side SPARQL in the browser; and small SPARQL endpoints for datasets and vocabularies.

Is Apache Jena TDB or Oxigraph more popular?

Apache Jena TDB ranks #175 on the WhichDB Score (18.9/100) and Oxigraph ranks #223 (15.1/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are Apache Jena TDB and Oxigraph open source?

Yes. Apache Jena TDB is open source. License: Apache License 2.0. Yes. Oxigraph is open source. License: Apache-2.0 OR MIT.