vs

Amazon Neptune vs GrapheneDB

Amazon Neptune: AWS's managed graph database speaking Gremlin, openCypher and SPARQL on shared storage. GrapheneDB: Managed hosting for Neo4j Community Edition on dedicated cloud instances, with backups and replicas.

key differences

  • Amazon Neptune is built for larger datasets (≤ 1 PB) than GrapheneDB (≤ 10 TB).
  • Only Amazon Neptune has geospatial, change data capture, online schema changes.
  • Only GrapheneDB has secondary indexes, full-text search.
  • Amazon Neptune has a serverless option; GrapheneDB does not.

choose amazon-neptune for

  • +Identity graphs and customer 360 on AWS
  • +Fraud detection
  • +Knowledge graphs with SPARQL
  • +Security and network graphs

best at · Traversal, Knowledge graph, OLTP

choose graphenedb for

  • +Production Neo4j apps on a budget
  • +Recommendation and social graphs for startups
  • +Managed graph backends for knowledge-graph prototypes

best at · Traversal, Knowledge graph, OLTP

overview
Primary model
Graph
Graph
Also supports
RDF / Triple Store
–
Type
Managed service
Managed service
Status
Active
Active
Developer
Amazon Web Services
GrapheneDB Labs
First release
2017
2013
Latest version
1.4.8.1 (Oct 6, 2026)
–
License
ProprietaryProprietary (AWS service)
ProprietaryProprietary service (hosts GPLv3 Neo4j Community Edition)
Free tier
✓
—
popularity
WhichDB Score
15.2
0.0
Rank
#219
#748
GitHub stars
–
–
Stack Overflow questions
1K
–
scale & guarantees
Comfortable data size
Large (≤ 1 PB)
Medium (≤ 10 TB)
Horizontal scaling
None
None
Multi-region
Read replicas
Read replicas
ACID
Full
Full
Consistency
Strong, Eventual
Strong
Schema
Schemaless
Flexible
Architecture
Primary replica, Shared storage, Serverless
Client server, Primary replica
deployment
Self-hosted
—
—
Vendor-managed cloud
✓
✓
Serverless
✓
—
Embedded
—
—
Edge
—
—
Clouds
AWS
AWS
capabilities
Transactions
✓
✓
Joins
—
—
Secondary indexes
—
✓
Full-text search
—
✓
Vector search
—
—
Geospatial
✓
—
JSON
—
—
Change data capture
✓
—
Triggers
—
—
Stored procedures
—
—
Materialized views
—
—
TTL / expiry
—
—
Pub/Sub
—
—
Columnar storage
—
—
In-memory
—
—
Durable persistence
✓
✓
Compression
—
—
Encryption at rest
✓
✓
Role-based access
✓
✓
Time travel
—
—
Branching
—
—
Online schema changes
✓
—
Streaming ingest
—
—
Offline sync
—
—
Runs in WebAssembly
—
—
interfaces
Query languages
Gremlin, openCypher, SPARQL
Cypher
Client languages
Java, Python, JavaScript, .NET, Go
Java, JavaScript, Python, Go, C#
Best for
Traversal, Knowledge graph, OLTP, RAG
Traversal, Knowledge graph, OLTP

Amazon Neptune vs GrapheneDB: FAQ

What is the difference between Amazon Neptune and GrapheneDB?

Amazon Neptune: AWS's managed graph database speaking Gremlin, openCypher and SPARQL on shared storage. GrapheneDB: Managed hosting for Neo4j Community Edition on dedicated cloud instances, with backups and replicas. Amazon Neptune is built for larger datasets (≤ 1 PB) than GrapheneDB (≤ 10 TB). Only Amazon Neptune has geospatial, change data capture, online schema changes. Only GrapheneDB has secondary indexes, full-text search.

When should I choose Amazon Neptune over GrapheneDB?

Choose Amazon Neptune for identity graphs and customer 360 on AWS; fraud detection; and knowledge graphs with SPARQL. Choose GrapheneDB for production Neo4j apps on a budget; recommendation and social graphs for startups; and managed graph backends for knowledge-graph prototypes.

Is Amazon Neptune or GrapheneDB more popular?

Amazon Neptune ranks #219 on the WhichDB Score (15.2/100) and GrapheneDB ranks #748 (0.0/100). Popularity is not fit: check the requirements that matter for your project.

Are Amazon Neptune and GrapheneDB open source?

No. Amazon Neptune is proprietary, closed-source software. No. GrapheneDB is proprietary, closed-source software.